![[syndicated profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/feed.png){kind=small}
Trace Elements: Conversations on the Project of Science Fiction and Fantasy, by Walton & Palmer
Mar. 11th, 2026 05:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
mrissaReview copy provided by the publisher. Also I've been friends with both authors for a good long while.
Which makes this a very weird book for me to read, honestly, because I met both Jo and Ada through SFF fandom and conventions, through all writing and talking and thinking about genres, and so a lot of the first third of this book is, for me, "the obvious stuff people talk about all the time." Well, sure. Because Jo and Ada are people, and I am around them talking about this kind of thing all the time (or at least intermittently for more than twenty years in one case and more than fifteen in the other, so it adds up), so naturally their points of view on genre theory are in the general category of "stuff I would logically have been exposed to by now." It's a bit "Hamlet is just a string of famous quotes strung together," as reactions go: kind of the cart before the horse. And it means that there are a few things that are in the category of "oh right, there's the thing I always disagree with Jo about; look, she still has her own idea about it rather than mine, go figure." This is to be expected given the long and winding discussion it's been, but it makes it a bit harder for me to say useful things about what it will look like to most readers.
So the first third of the book is the part that most obviously fits the title--it's the section that has the largest-scale thoughts about the nature of genre qua genre. The second third was the most satisfying to me: it was thoughts on disability and pain. I think a too-casual reader might mistake it for random padding to make this book book-length without requiring Jo and/or Ada (some of the sections are co-written and some are written solo by each author) to write more entirely new material. But no. Absolutely not. The way that Jo and Ada process disability is strongly shaped by each of their perspectives as SFF writers and readers, and the way they process SFF is--sometimes subtly, sometimes overtly--shaped by their lived experiences as disabled people. Some of our personal stories are about the project of science fiction and fantasy. Jo's and Ada's are. And they're useful--powerful--to see on the page like this. This is where knowing people for a quite long time doesn't give me a "yes I have already been here" reaction, because three disabled friends do not talk about disability and personal history and its place in the speculative project in the same way as two of them would write about it for a general audience. It's a view from a very different angle, which is great to have. The last section is more miscellany, still related to the title but more specifics, less sweeping theory. It's labeled craft, and this is true, but in a broad sense--there are pieces about The Princess Bride and optimism and censorship as well as about protagonists and empathy in a structural sense.
I wonder if people who come to this book from reading mostly Ada rather than both but by the numbers more Jo would see how Jo has influenced Ada's prose voice in the joint pieces. For me, the stylistic commonalities with Inventing the Renaissance were really striking, but if you'd come directly from reading that I wonder how much you'd be saying, oh, that's got to be Jo Walton because it's not really what I'm used to from Ada Palmer solo! Co-authorship is an interesting beast, and I feel like there's a difficult balance here that's partially achieved by having pieces by each person solo as well as the two together. I'm not sure I can immediately come up with another thing like it that way.
Korean practice
Mar. 9th, 2026 01:57 pmprofiterole_readsYou can write about whatever you want. If you're uninspired, tell us the story of what you're currently watching/reading/playing...
You can talk to one another.
You can also correct one another. Or just indicate "No corrections, please" in your comment if you prefer.
화이팅! <3
Zero Happily Ever Afters by MN Bennet
Mar. 8th, 2026 05:46 pmprofiterole_readsIn terms of plot, the stakes have increased a lot in this tome. I prefer less over-the-top storylines, but so far, the author has managed to keep them sufficiently grounded.
There's major m/m, which used to be m/m/m (Finn died a few years before Book 1, but we have all the flashbacks, so maybe that still counts as polyamory). The students include an m/m couple, a sapphic, an ace girl, a trans boy, an enby... And there's a trans woman among the new superheroes!
For more HP-like LGBT Books, check out my rec list.
I speak fluent human
Mar. 2nd, 2026 08:16 ammrissaBridgerton Season 4B
Mar. 1st, 2026 05:31 pmprofiterole_readsI adore Bi!Benedict. Episode 7 had me teary-eyed on several occasions, but I'm looking forward to the f/f season. It will be S5 or S6, they haven't been any more specific than this.
Books read, late February
Mar. 1st, 2026 10:22 ammrissaJoan Coggin, The Mystery at Orchard House, Why Did She Die?, and Dancing With Death. So I finished this series all in one gulp, which I wouldn't have done if a friend had not lent me the last two, but...they did, so here we are, no regrets whatsoever. They're very much on the light end of mystery, and Lady Lupin remains funny and generally quite kind. I don't know that they're going to change your life except for giving you some pleasant hours in your life, which...sometimes is the kind of changing your life a person needs right now.
Kate Emery, The Dysfunctional Family's Guide to Murder. This is a YA mystery from an Australian writer, and while I don't know a lot of Australian teens, the voice feels authentic to me. Another on the light end of mystery, successfully so.
Jamie Holmes, The Free and the Dead: The Untold Story of the Black Seminole Chief, the Indigenous Rebel, and America's Forgotten War. I really appreciated having a lot more about this period filled in. I feel like the way that American schools taught the Trail of Tears, at least when I was in school and I strongly suspect now, sort of...had it happen in isolation. Did not encourage people to do the math and realize that the Southern whites who were "defending their way of life" had in many cases had that land and that way of life for less time than I've lived in the house I live in now. The relationships between Black Americans and Native Americans have been complex and interesting, and a book that focuses on some of that also does a better job of decentering whiteness than many histories, so hurray for that.
S.L. Huang, The Language of Liars. Discussed elsewhere.
Fatemeh Jamalpour and Nilo Tabrizy, For the Sun After Long Nights: The Story of Iran's Woman-Led Uprising. Oof, the timing on this one. Well. It's an earnest account from two writers, one of whom was on the ground for the events described. This is very recent history--2022-24 or thereabouts--so if you don't have any familiarity with Iran outside that period you'll probably want additional reading before or after reading this, but I think after would be fine, I think you could learn about these brave women now and get more of their backstory later with no problem.
Judy I. Lin, Song of the Six Realms. This was secondary world YA fantasy that frankly did not stick with me particularly well. There was a girl musician swept away to a magical realm with peril and stuff, and it was fine, it did just fine at that, but I wasn't really driven to seek out more of the author's work.
C. Thi Nguyen, The Score: How to Stop Playing Someone Else's Game. For my group of friends I am very much toward the "non-game-enthusiast" end of the spectrum, so one of the things that was interesting to me about this book is that he could be very clear about what things appeal to game enthusiasts in ways that I could understand even if I didn't share them. But I think the parallels and cross-connections with games and metrics, and how to keep that from growing toxic, is some really useful stuff, worth thinking about.
Karen Parkman, The Jills. This was a very readable thriller that ended up mildly disappointing to me in the end. The protagonist is a member of the Buffalo Bills American football team's cheerleader group, the Jills (if you're like me you did not know that they had a special name), and another of her cheerleader friends goes missing. She has dealt with missing loved ones before because her sister has struggled with addiction, which makes for compelling backstory in a thriller context. However, I felt like several of the plot twists were not very smart ("what if your stalker actually helps you out and is not the real problem" no stop that), and the ending pulled its punches both on dealing with the toxic aspects of professional football cheerleading that it had started to gesture at and at making the protagonist deal with her personal life choices and history.
Cat Sebastian, After Hours at Dooryard Books. I am a tough sell for romances, and I don't want to say "but this isn't a romance" just because I like it. It is, it is a romance between two men in 1968. It is also an historical novel about grief. It is both, it can be both, and it is very beautifully both. It also involves raising a baby and learning to be a family. It is also about moving forward from things you are not proud of without denying they've happened. I love this book. I am so glad about this book. I picked it up because two different friends said it was just what they needed right now, and it was just what I needed too.
